Published on YaleGlobal Online Magazine (http://yaleglobal.yale.edu)
Home > NSA Spying: A Threat to US Interests?

NSA Spying: A Threat to US Interests?

Reports that the US National Security Agency has collected internet and telephone data in Europe could influence negotiations for a proposed Transatlantic Trade and Partnership and require new understanding on rules for the digital economy. Bruce Stokes, director of global economic attitudes at the Pew Research Center, reports on recent surveys: A majority of Americans suggest that it’s unacceptable for the United States to monitor phone calls of the leaders of allied nations; also, majorities in Germany, France, Sweden, the United States – though not in Britain – suggest that a nation’s surveillance of its own citizens’ telephone or internet data for security purposes is not justified. Majorities in Germany, French, and Sweden also do not find spying on citizens in other nations as justifiable. Favorable ratings of the United States are on the decline. Europeans now closely eye data collections by businesses and may consider regulations on cross-border transfers, while US companies point to potential economic benefits in detecting big-data secrets. – YaleGlobal

NSA Spying: A Threat to US Interests?

Big-data snooping by the NSA and US companies unnerves many Europeans, polls suggest
Bruce Stokes
YaleGlobal, 5 December 2013
Who is on the line? German Chancellor Angela Merkel is angered by alleged NSA phone tap, top; citizens in Berlin demonstrate against surveillance

WASHINGTON: Revelations by Edward Snowden of US National Security Agency spying have exposed both similarities and differences in public attitudes toward privacy among Europeans and Americans. Both publics value privacy, but Americans, more so than most Europeans, appear willing to sacrifice privacy in the name of security. These differences pose potential challenges to the ongoing free trade discussions between the European Union and the United States, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, where new rules governing the digital economy could prove central to a final agreement.  

Americans have conflicting views about NSA activities done in their name. They suggest that the National Security Agency may have gone too far in spying on US allies. They also think that the NSA has intruded on Americans' personal privacy in scooping up massive amounts of private phone calls and emails. But, in the pursuit of terrorists, a majority will still trade their personal privacy for greater security.

Such differences have raised new doubts in Europe about the United States. German Chancellor Angela Merkel recently told members of the German parliament that US spying “must be explained and more importantly new trust must be built up for the future.” And, while it’s too early to know the lasting impact of the Snowden affair on transatlantic relations, Europeans’ perceptions of the United States, especially as a stalwart defender of individual freedom, may face new strains.

recent survey by the Pew Research Center found that 56 percent of Americans said it is unacceptable for the United States to monitor the phone calls of the leaders of allied nations, including Merkel. Just 36 percent said it is a tolerable practice.

European perceptions of the US, especially as stalwart defender of individual freedoms, may face new strains.

American wariness of NSA activities may, in part, reflect concern about a possible invasion of their own privacy. In a mid-July Washington Post-ABC News survey, 49 percent said they thought that the NSA surveillance program intruded on their personal privacy rights. And 74 percent said it infringed on some Americans' privacy, if not their own.

Nevertheless, when asked to balance security worries against privacy concerns, Americans opt for security. In that same Washington Post-ABC News poll, 57 percent felt that it was important for the federal government to investigate terrorist threats, even if it intrudes on personal freedom. Just 39 percent said that the government should not intrude on personal privacy, even if it limits the government’s ability to investigate possible terrorist threats.

There has been little cross-national polling of European views on the NSA affair. And the questions are often worded differently or conducted with differing methodologies, so that comparisons between polling findings are more illustrative than definitive. But what has been done suggests notable differences with American viewpoints and some broad similarities.

Like Americans, Europeans appear to be worried about personal privacy. They do not think that national security concerns warrant an invasion of their privacy. Majorities in Germany (70 percent), France (52 percent) and Sweden (52 percent) think that their own government would not be justified in collecting the telephone and internet data of its citizens as part an effort to protect national security, according to a survey done by TNS Opinion for the German Marshall Fund of the United States. A substantial minority, or 44 percent, of people in the United Kingdom agree. In this survey, 54 percent of Americans surveyed suggested that such activity would go too far in violating citizens' privacy and is therefore not justified.

Europeans do not think that national security concerns warrant an invasion
of their privacy.

Another difference emerged in this survey between American and European attitudes toward spying on one’s allies. Publics on both sides of the Atlantic think national security is no justification for action, but it’s a sentiment held more strongly by some Europeans than by Americans. A strong majority of Germans (72 percent) and more than half the French and the Swedes (each 55 percent) did not think that national governments are justified in collecting telephone and internet data of citizens in other allied countries even as part of an effort to protect national security, according to the TNS/GMF survey. More British, 43 percent, thought it was unjustified than saw it as justified, 30 percent. Notably, American attitudes resembled those of the British – 44 percent unjustified, 33 percent justified.

The exposure of NSA spying has had an impact on America's image abroad, especially in Europe.

In spring 2013, before extensive revelations of NSA activities, a median of 62 percent in five European Union nations – Britain, France, Germany, Poland and Spain – had a favorable view of the United States, according to a Pew Research Center survey. That included 76 percent for Italians, 64 percent for the French and 53 percent for Germans.

That median was already in decline, down from 67 percent in 2009. It’s unclear whether the NSA affair will accelerate that erosion or prove a minor bump in the road in transatlantic relations. But there are some early warning signs. A recent poll by the German public broadcaster, ARD and the German daily Die Welt, found that only 35 percent of Germans consider the US government to be trustworthy.

Moreover, the US government's respect for individual liberty has long been a strong suit of American public diplomacy. Even in many nations where opposition to US foreign policy is widespread and where overall ratings for the United States are low, majorities or pluralities maintained that the country respects individual rights.

Differences are
already playing out
in negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership.

In the 2013 Pew Research Center survey, a median of 70 percent of people in 39 nations thought the United States government respected the personal freedoms of its people. In contrast, a median of only 36 percent saw China protecting individual liberties.

This view of America as a resolute defender of civil rights was particularly strong in Europe: Italy (82 percent), Germany (81 percent), France (80 percent) and Spain (69 percent). Positive views of Uncle Sam's record had risen by 20 points in Spain, 15 in France and 11 in Germany since 2008. But these are now the countries where some of the public outcry against NSA spying has been loudest.

So Americans are of two minds about recent allegations of NSA surveillance of phone and email communications. They worry about its impact on international relations and their own privacy. But that concern continues to be trumped by an ongoing anxiety about terrorism. Europeans similarly share concerns about spying’s impact on privacy, but they generally do not think national security concerns are more important than privacy.

These differences are already playing out in the negotiations over the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Some European officials have called for a pause in the talks in response to the Snowden revelations. That is unlikely. But NSA spying has revived European concerns about who owns data generated by individual consumers through their credit card purchases, internet searches and the like – and what private companies can and cannot do with that data. Some European privacy advocates would like to ban the cross-border transfer of such data. But many companies, especially data-intensive American firms like Google and Facebook, and even companies like General Electric, claim that the business model of the new digital economy is built on the ability to amass and analyze large sets of data. They argue that quarantining such information within national borders will deny future generations many of the economic benefits to be gained from big data.

The transatlantic disagreement over NSA intrusion into personal privacy is not simply a national security issue, it now has business implications.

 

Bruce Stokes is director of global economic attitudes at the Pew Research Center.

Rights:© 2013 The Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies at Yale

Comments on this Article

10 December 2013
This MASSIVE and intrusive data gathering carried out by the United States of America is nothing but a lame DISGUISE to STEAL commercial, industrial and the politics life of nations all over the world (friends and allies included).
Lets analyse just the recent siege to Kenya's shopping mall.
According to information widely available on the media, hundreds of extremists, worked for more than a year inside of the premises, intensively using telephones and emails all going through, if unintentionally, via America's PRISM and other data theft mechanisms that, according to an embarrassed American government's explanations, mine for terror related intelligence.
Such an IMMENSELY EXPENSIVE machinery, dedicated to catch terror related meaning on text and voice could NEVER have allowed such MASSIVE operation to go undetected IF IT WAS REALLY GEARED TOWARD THAT purpose.
Lets not forget that most of this digital traffic circulates on data networks either on American soil or ILLEGALLY taped by American spies and their willing contributors.
Currently America survives by MADLY printing money and now, as it seems obvious, is dedicated to GET OUT OF THE HOLE, by just doing their best to STEAL commercial, industrial and OIL and mineral reserves information from Latin American nations and likely many others still to be revealed places.
And if it was not enough, Obama's spies taped the private telephone of several leaders all over the globe including Brazilian and German leaders...
Did America expect to find that Dilma and Merkel are part of the latest AXIS of TERROR?
-Paulo Borges , Americans look for terrorists where THERE IS NONE!
9 December 2013
The NSA is truly a change agent today, albeit, a draconian one. The only question anyone ever asks now is, "Are we doing that?" followed quickly by, "Do you think we need a license or can we just take it?" Increasingly, the answer is, "Just take it and see what happens."
THAT is what is killing the American ideal of fair play, destroying the moral fiber our business leaders, and violating our enduring principles. The world IS paying attention to our actions much more than our political pronouncements through government channels. When we license the work of people who have created something useful instead of calling lawyers to fight our battles, or worse, go kinetic in foreign lands on useful groups of technocrats based on fear then we have truly lost the war for hearts and minds.
Real winners, not sore losers, realize they benefit way beyond their individual abilities and something stirs in them to give back to the digital community that created their opportunities. We will have reached a true milestone in the digital realm worthy of universal respect and admiration when we act on our principles instead of our fear.
I know for a fact that I stand on the shoulders of giants (living and dead) and owe a debt I can never repay to them. My only hope is that I can bear the load upon my shoulders IF I AM FOUND TO BE USEFUL.
-Ken Haumschilt , NSA as an engine of innovation