Thomson Reuters Foundation: World Needs “Carbon Sucking” Technology by 2030s, Scientists Warn

The world is failing to reduce emissions fast enough to ease the consequences of climate change – extreme weather, rising seas, violent wildfires and loss of biodiversity. Some nations like the United States are defiant about recognizing the problem, taking responsibility and demonstrating leadership – promoting reliance on coal without investing in emission control. Scientists warn engineering solutions – including carbon-sucking technology – must be mastered to keep the world habitable for future generations. Nations agreed in 2015 to a goal of preventing the average global temperature rise from surpassing 1.5 degrees Celsius. The world has already reached the 1-degree mark, researchers report, and technology is required to keep the rise less than 2 degrees. Methods under review include planting massive forests and storing emissions underground, but these are costly and unproven. Technology cannot be counted on for quick fixes or rescue. For now, according to the director of director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research at the University of East Anglia, the easiest and most affordable methods include increasing energy efficiency, producing less meat and relying on alternative energies. – YaleGlobal

Thomson Reuters Foundation: World Needs “Carbon Sucking” Technology by 2030s, Scientists Warn

Methods to capture and store emissions to clean up atmosphere, such as planting forests and pumping carbon underground, are costly and require more testing
Laurie Goering
Wednesday, October 11, 2017

As efforts to cut planet-warming emissions fall short, large-scale projects to suck carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere will be needed by the 2030s to hold the line against climate change, scientists said on Tuesday.

Many new technologies that aim to capture and store carbon emissions, thereby delivering “negative emissions,” are costly, controversial and in the early phase of testing.

But “if you’re really concerned about coral reefs, biodiversity (and) food production in very poor regions, we’re going to have to deploy negative emission technology at scale,” said Bill Hare of Climate Analytics, a science and policy institute. “I don’t think we can have confidence that anything else can do this,” the Berlin-based chief executive told a London climate change conference.

World leaders agreed in 2015 an aim of holding global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial times.

Scientists believe this is key to protecting small island nations from sea level rise, shoring up food production and preventing extreme weather. Carbon-sucking technologies may even be needed to hold the planet to a less ambitious 2 degrees Celsius of warming, said scientists at Chatham House, a British think tank.

The world has already seen an average of about 1 degree of warming, they said. “It’s something you don’t want to talk about very much but it’s an unaccountable truth: we will need geoengineering by the mid-2030s to have a chance at the (1.5 degree) goal,” Hare said, referring to efforts to cool the planet through engineering.

These ideas include planting carbon-absorbing forests across large areas, then harvesting the wood for energy and pumping the emissions produced underground - a process likely to feature in an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report next year.

Machines might also be developed to capture carbon dioxide directly from the air and pump it underground or otherwise neutralize it. But efforts to store captured carbon underground are “showing no progress… and even backwards steps in some cases”, said Corinne Le Quéré, director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research at the University of East Anglia.

Underground carbon storage has been promoted as part of a push by the United States and other countries to develop “clean coal” technology.

Similarly, planting more forests - a technology known as BECCS, or bioenergy with carbon capture and storage - raises questions about food security and land rights, scientists said. Le Quéré said BECCS is “probably essential to take us to zero emissions” although “it’s really difficult to imagine we can use land at the levels required in the models”.

She called for experts to focus on proven approaches, such as improving energy efficiency, promoting cleaner transport, eating less meat and scaling up renewable energies. Many experts fear that launching costly “negative emissions” technologies could reduce the pressure to act swiftly to cut emissions now.

The Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, covers humanitarian news, climate change, resilience, women’s rights, trafficking and property rights.

© 2017 Reuters. All Rights Reserved.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.