Published on YaleGlobal Online Magazine (
Home > Xi-Obama Summit: Bridging the Trust Deficit in US-China Ties?

Xi-Obama Summit: Bridging the Trust Deficit in US-China Ties?

China and the United States disagree on many issues – including claims for the South China Sea, intellectual property protections, open access to the internet and free speech. Leaders of the world’s two largest economies also have reason to cooperate on global initiatives. Xi Jinping, China’s president and general secretary of the Communist Party, visited the United States, meeting US President Barack Obama and leaders in the tech industry. Success of the summit requires that agreements are indeed implemented, suggests Robert Manning, a senior fellow of the Brent Scowcroft Center for International Security at the Atlantic Council. Manning concludes, “The increasingly difficult challenge is to sustain a relationship that is more cooperative than competitive – and not allow one area of disagreement or confrontation overwhelm the overall relationship.” With follow-through on contentious issues like cybersecurity, investment, climate change, Xi could increase trust and reduce antagonistic talk on China during the US presidential campaign. – YaleGlobal

Xi-Obama Summit: Bridging the Trust Deficit in US-China Ties?

China and the US face many complex issues; the challenge is not letting one overwhelm the relationship
Robert A. Manning
YaleGlobal, 29 September 2015
Wary welcome: US President Barack Obama welcomes Chinese President Xi Jinping with pomp and ceremony, top, but suspicion over Chinese expansionist designs as seen in the satellite image of an airstrip built on artificial island in the South China Sea.

WASHINGTON: Xi Jinping’s state visit to the United States took place amid great uncertainty and heightened tensions in US policy toward China.

The relationship between the world’s two largest economies and two biggest military powers, arguably the world’s most important, could be at a tipping point. Xi’s visit marked a major juncture in the relationship. Despite positive speeches and glad news of White House fact sheets, there are few signs that Xi is altering his nationalist economic policies biased toward creating “national champions” and using opaque, discriminatory legal and regulatory policies that complicate life for US investors. Nor are there indications that Beijing is rethinking its assertive foreign policies challenging the US posture in East Asia.

Over time, Xi’s success in implementing sweeping market reforms aimed at changing China’s economic model from an investment and export-driven one to an innovative consumer-driven and service-oriented one may be the critical factor in shaping Beijing’s economic and foreign policies in the future.

Many of the assumptions that have guided US policy on China since US President Nixon’s visit in 1972 and still employed by the Obama administration are being called into doubt by US businesses as well as strategic analysts amid rising Chinese nationalism. Concerns over cybersecurity, Chinese techno-nationalism, difficulties for US businesses operating in China as well as China’s assertive posture in the South China Sea pose challenges on US policy toward China.

Agreements on cybersecurity, investment and climate change may put the relationship on a more stable path.

Despite the concerns, though, agreements on cybersecurity, a Bilateral Investment Treaty and climate change appear to have tamped down US anger and moved the relationship toward a relatively more stable path.

The economic relationship is key, as demonstrated by the remarkable array of top CEOs gathered in Seattle to meet Xi. By all accounts, he was impressive, addressing many US concerns about China’s direction.

Both sides sought to reassure the other. The White House welcomed Xi with a 21-gun salute and red carpet treatment usually reserved for US democratic allies, a recognition Xi has sought for China as a great power. In his speech and meetings in Seattle, Xi emphasized that “opening up is a basic state policy of China” and pledged to implement reforms to give the market a “decisive role” and to “protect the legitimate rights and interests of foreign investors.”

Arguably the most contentious issue facing the two leaders is cybersecurity. The two countries have markedly different views of the internet: The US focus is on access, and China endorses “cyber sovereignty” and its Great Firewall to control access.

Massive cyberespionage of the US Office of Personnel Management, hacking information on 21 million current and former US officials, and the cyber-theft of intellectual property belonging to US firms reached the boiling point such that President Barack Obama was gearing up to issue sanctions against Chinese companies for benefiting from cyber-theft of intellectual property rights.

This threat led to unprecedented closed-door negotiations between top aides to Xi and US officials including US Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey. These talks appear to have paved the way for a common ground achieved at the summit.

The agreed formulation is that “neither country’s government will conduct or knowingly support cyber-enabled theft of intellectual property, including trade secrets or other confidential business information, with the intent of providing competitive advantages to companies or commercial sectors.” In addition, Xi and Obama agreed to create a cabinet-level mechanism and a hotline to address concerns. Both pledged to cooperate in creating a global code of conduct for cyberscecurity.

Underscoring lingering skepticism, Obama questioned if China’s words would be followed by actions.

Underscoring lingering skepticism that China would stop doing what it insists it has never done, Obama questioned if words would be followed by actions. Nonetheless, the agreement marks the first time for such a commitment from Beijing and, if implemented, could be a major breakthrough.

Cyber issues are among larger concerns over the economic relationship that totaled $590 billion in two-way trade in 2014 and China’s holding of $1.2 trillion in US Treasury bonds. In pre-summit meetings in Seattle with several dozen leading CEOs, Xi heard complaints about deepening obstacles facing foreign businesses in China, as reflected in comments from US Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzger: “We – and our companies – continue to have serious concerns about an overall lack of legal and regulatory transparency, inconsistent protection of intellectual property, discriminatory cyber and technology policies, and more generally, the lack of a level playing field across a range of sectors.”

Xi and Obama announced progress on the Bilateral Investment Treaty that has the potential to strengthen the key, yet beleaguered economic pillar of the relationship and revive waning US business enthusiasm. Talks had stalled as each side offered “negative lists” of items to be excluded. These lists can wall off industries considered strategic such as energy, aviation, telecommunications or access to state-owned industry procurement. Many were on the initial lists, and these appeared to have been pared back, with both leaders pledging to accelerate efforts on the investment treaty.

There were also agreements on finance and development cooperation, including Beijing commitments to the Bretton Woods system as well as on a range of global issues such as wildlife protection, development, infectious diseases, terrorism and non-proliferation, the cooperative dimension of the relationship.

The showcase global issue is increased US-China climate cooperation. Xi’s announced commitment to a cap-and-trade carbon scheme, similar to that of the European Union, is emblematic of the Sino-US climate partnership, as is China’s cooperation in obtaining the Iran nuclear accord. However, the EU system has been problematic, with mismatches between carbon prices and the allowance of permits, leaving prices too low to provide incentives for industry. Implementing reforms would be tougher in China’s much larger and more complex carbon market.

On key security issues, apart from a modest confidence-building measure of improving air-to-air military communication, there appears little progress on maritime issues in the South China Sea. Xi reiterated Chinese claims to the entire South China Sea, but offered only a vague pledge not to “militarize” some 2000 acres of reclaimed land on disputed islets where China has recently built ports and airstrips. There is little indication that the summit will alter US-China strategic competition in the Asia-Pacific and confrontation over China’s maritime behavior.

The challenge is to sustain a relationship that is more cooperative than competitive and not let one issue overshadow ties.

Obama has described his foreign policy as “hitting singles and doubles,” not home runs – baseball terminology for moving in spurts rather than with big plays. All told, the summit appears to be a solid single. One problem in assessing Sino-US ties is that the bilateral relationship is so massive and intricate that areas of friction cannot be avoided. The increasingly difficult challenge is to sustain a relationship that is more cooperative than competitive – and not allow one area of disagreement or confrontation overwhelm overall ties, for example, letting tensions over maritime issues lead to reactions, like sanctions, that would undercut more cooperative areas of the relationship.

Implementation of many of the agreements reached at the Xi-Obama meeting can serve as metrics of whether China is moving toward cooperation. If so, China could reduce the trust deficit in Sino-US ties and put the relationship on a trajectory that encourages Obama’s successor in 2017 to also pursue a policy that is more cooperative than competitive.

The author is a Senior Fellow of the Brent Scowcroft Center for International Security at the Atlantic Council. Follow him on Twitter.

Rights:Copyright © 2015 YaleGlobal and the MacMillan Center

Comments on this Article

2 October 2015
The latest summit only goes to show that:
1. Previous, sustained efforts to make 'common ground' yield long-term cooperation have failed. In fact, the focus on agreeing rather than discussing and solving has resulted in....
2. Less 'common ground' to talk about. Cyber was once in this category, but the Chinese would rather hack our networks. We both agree that blue skies and clean waters are preferable, but Xi announced his cap-in-trade effort unilaterally, before he met Obama as if to deny the President 'common ground' deliberately. On air-air encounters, the agreement is probably an indication of how bad the relationship it rather than a confidence building measure. Think about it. Do we feel the need to do these sorts of agreements with other 'partners'? So if Xi is not interested then what is the point?
3. The visuals. The Chinese blanketed their airwaves with coverage of the summit, showing Xi being saluted time and time again by Obama and the US. This is key, especially since Xi poked Obama in the eye with his navy when Obama was in Alaska trying to focus on climate change. Obama, in effect, thanked Xi for coming despite the insult. It's a powerful message for Xi and China.
4. So why did Obama do it? He says he is going after 'singles and doubles', not home runs. Based on the nonexistent Syria strategy (cost us $40M to train 4-5 guys to give away their weapons....USAF apparently can't defeat ISIS and needs the Russian Air Force to assist??) it appears that this foreign policy team is going to bat praying for a walk.
What to do? The US has to create 'trade space' to talk about. Unless we exert FON we will lose it. If we exert it, for example, in an expansive way (which China might not like), THEN we have something to talk about. Right now, the US rolls over on every Chinese provocation so they have zero incentive to be willing to engage meaningfully.
-McCaffery , Wrong
1 October 2015
I think it's the China Crisis which creates a global effect to almost all of the world bring Xi come to US. However the world still wait for Yellen increase the interest rate. And Yellen stiil wait for China crisis pass. that is why Obama so wlecome to Xi.
-Hanny , Two Biggest Country Join?